Saturday, December 07, 2013

John Adams: Peace Maker -HIRD

Note: This is a test blog post, as I have been unable to post for the past few months.  I went into this blog through www.blogger.com rather than blogger.ca.

By the Rev. Dr. Ed Hird

John Adams (1)


Every Christmas we hear Christmas Carolers singing ‘Peace on Earth’. One of my most popular Deep Cove Crier articles, with almost 17,000 online readers, has been my article on John Adams’ good friend Benjamin Franklin. Both were founding fathers of our neighbour to the south.  My American relatives have told me that Adams is the greater man.


Adams’ greatest strength and weakness was that he was a passionate peace-maker, even at the cost of sabotaging his own re-election as the second American President.  Napoleon in 1797 captured 300 American ships, six percent of the American fleet. (1)  The ‘hawks’ in Adams’ own Federalist party desperately wanted to go to war with France, but Adams negotiated a peace treaty that allowed him to disband Alexander Hamilton’s unnecessary and costly army.  Hamilton, the commander of this army, took this as a personal insult, and dedicated himself to splitting Adams’ own Federalist Party.  John Adams wrote his wife Abigail saying that he knew “Hamilton to be a proud-spirited, conceited, aspiring mortal, always pretending to morality…as great a hypocrite as any in the US…” (2)


thomasjeffersonWith two Federalist presidential candidates, the Republican presidential candidate, Thomas Jefferson, won the election on the 36thballot after a deadlocked Congressional tie vote. (3) Jefferson, who had foolishly endorsed the blood-thirsty French Revolution, was wisely mentored by Adams.  At his final State of Union address, President Adams stated: “Here and throughout our country, may simple measures, pure morals, and true religion, flourish forever!” (4)  His final prayer as he left the House was: “I pray Heaven to bestow the best of Blessings on this House and all that shall hereafter inhabit it. May none but honest and wise Men ever rule under this roof.” (5) Despite strong political differences, Adams and Jefferson ended as good pen pal friends, both dying in 1826 on the significant American July 4th holiday. (6)   Jefferson acknowledged Adams as ‘the colossus of independence.’ (7)


John Adams was both passionate about liberty and yet cautious about our human tendency to selfishness.  James Grant commended Adams for “his unqualified love of liberty, and his unsentimental perception of the human condition.” (8)  As such, Adams produced constitutional boundaries that guarded people’s essential freedoms of life and liberty of speech, assembly, and religion.  The US Congress praised Adams for his “patriotism, perseverance, integrity and diligence.” (9)   Adams insightfully commented: “our Constitution was made only for a moral & religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” (10) The root of equality, said Adams, was the Golden Rule – Love your neighbour as yourself.  (11)


John Adams 2Adams has been described as one of North America’s greatest bibliophiles.  He loved to learn, reading voraciously in wide-ranging areas of interest, including the Bible.  Equality for Adams was grounded in equal access to education for all: “knowledge monopolized, or in the Possession of a few, is a Curse to Mankind. We should dispense it among all Ranks.  We should educate our children.  Equality should be preserved in knowledge.” (12)  His prayer for his children was: ““Let them revere nothing but religion, morality, and liberty.”  (13)


One of Adams’ strengths was that he was deeply honest, even to his own political detriment. Unlike the worldly-wise Benjamin Franklin, he would say exactly what was on his mind. Adams urged Franklin to get more exercise, saying that “the sixth Commandment forbids a man to kill himself as it does to kill his neighbour. A sedentary life is tantamount to suicide.” (14)  James Grant commented that “like the mythical George Washington, he seemed incapable of telling a lie; he was naturally and organically honest.” (15)  Adams once commented: “The Ten Commandments and the Sermon on the Mount contain my religion.”(16)  Adams was indeed an unusual politician. He found the endless political bickering to be painful and pointless, commenting that “a resolution that two plus two makes five would require fully two days of debate.” (17)  Adams was known as a foul-weather politician, only drawn to serve his country because of the intense crisis.  He would have much rather been anywhere else: “The longer I live and the more I see of public men, the more I wish to be a private one.” (18)  Adams was a latecomer to American Independence, preferring to work for reconciliation with the British.  While Benjamin Franklin had favour and therefore initial funding from France , John Adams eventually obtained key loans to the United States from the cautious Dutch.  Because of his endless negotiations in France, Holland and England, Adams only saw his dear wife Abigail for a grand total of three months over six years. (19)   He wrote to Josiah Quincy: “Happy is the man who has nothing to do with politics and strife.” (20)


 king-george-iiiOne of Adams’ first assignments in Congress was to draft a resolution  appointing a day of fasting, humiliation, and prayer throughout the thirteen colonies: “that we may, with united hearts and voices, unfeignedly confess and deplore our many sins, and offer up our joint supplications to the all-wise Omnipotent, and merciful Disposer of all events; humbling beseeching him to forgive our iniquities, to remove our present calamities, to avert those desolating judgments with which we are threatened, and to bless our rightful sovereign, King George the third.” (21)   Sadly King George dismissed Adams and his colleagues as ‘wicked and desperate persons.’ (22)


King George’s thirty-three thousand British troops resulted in thirty-five thousand American deaths by sword, sickness, or captivity. (23) Adams knew that without heart-forgiveness, American independence would quickly become as barbaric as the French Revolution:  “In a time of war, one may see the necessity and utility of the divine prohibitions of revenge and the Injunctions of forgiveness of Injuries and love of Enemies, which we find in Christian Religion. Unrestrained, in some degree by these benevolent Laws, Men would be Devils, at such a Time as such.”  (24)


John Adams3In 1815 he wrote his own gravestone epitaph: “Here lies John Adams, who took upon himself the responsibility of the peace with France in the year 1800.” (25)  My prayer is that we too may be passionate peace-makers like President John Adams.



The Rev. Dr. Ed Hird, Rector

St. Simon’s Church North Vancouver

Anglican Mission in the Americas (Canada)

http://stsimonschurch.ca

 -an article for the Dec 2013 Deep Cove Crier

-award-winning author of the book ‘Battle for the Soul of Canada’

http://www.battleforthesoulofcanada.blogspot.com

p.s. In order to obtain a copy of the book ‘Battle for the Soul of Canada’, please send a $18.50 cheque to ‘Ed Hird’, #1008-555 West 28th Street, North Vancouver, BC V7N 2J7. For mailing the book to the USA, please send $20.00 USD. This can also be done by PAYPAL using the e-mail ed_hird@telus.net . Be sure to list your mailing address. The Battle for the Soul of Canada e-book can be obtained for $9.99 CDN/USD.

-Click to download a complimentary PDF copy of the Battle for the Soul study guide : Seeking God’s Solution for a Spirit-Filled Canada

You can also download the complimentary Leader’s Guide PDF: Battle for the Soul Leaders Guide

Footnotes

(1) James Grant, John Adams: Party of One , (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York, NY, 2005), p. 392.

(2) Gore Vidal, Inventing a Nation: Washington, Adams, Jefferson, (Yale University Press, New Haven, 2003), p. 133.

(3)  David McCullough, John Adams , (Simon and Schuster, New York, NY, 2001), p. 572.

(4)  John Adams, State Of The Union Address 11/11/1800,

  http://readbookonline.net/readOnLine/50063/

(5) McCullough, John Adams, p. 560, picture 57.

(6) McCullough, p. 646.

(7) http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Colossus+of+Independence.-a079789133

(8) Grant, p. 61.

(9)  Grant, p. 336.

(10) http://www.john-adams-heritage.com/quotes/

(11) McCullough, p. 543.

(12) Fragmentary Notes for ‘A Dissertation on the Canon and the Feudal Law’,  http://founders.archives.gov/documents/Adams/06-01-02-0052-0002

(13) Grant, p. 165.

(14) Grant, p. 287.

(15) Grant, p. 100.

(16) Grant, p. 442.

(17) Grant, p. 142.

(18) Grant, p. 146; McCullough, p. 207.

(19) McCullough, p. 271 “At last, on June 11th 1782, Adams negotiated with a syndicate of three Amsterdam banking houses — Willink, Van Staphorst, and De la Lande & Fynje — a loan of five million guilders, or two million dollars at five percent interest.  It was not the ten million dollars Congress had expected…”;  Grant, p. 196.

(20) Grant, p. 157.

(21) Grant, p. 153.

(22) Grant, p. 152.

(23) Grant, p. 256.

(24) Grant, p. 184.

(25) Grant, p. 383.

Friday, December 06, 2013

No One Should be Invisible - Rose McCormick Brandon

A man dropped in to my blog to read my articles on Joan Sepp. His reason for visiting was the recent death of Joan’s husband, Toivo. (Joan passed away a few years ago.) My visitor left this note - 
"I had a hard childhood and was often upset when I delivered the newspaper (to the Sepp home). On the days when I was most alone, one of them often met me at the door and chatted with me. I can't even count the number of times I didn't do something rash because these strong people had taken time to speak with me."
This caused me to think about the “invisible” people who cross our paths each day. They serve us in restaurants, grocery stores and banks. They deliver mail, parcels, newspapers and fliers, fill our gas tanks, pour our coffee, clean our messes and repair our stuff. They take our complaints, reduce our phone bills, ask us to please subscribe to their magazine, offer us deals on this and that, tempt us to buy chocolate bars and cookies. Mostly, they are front-line people who serve. They don’t control their product. But, often we act like they do.
 
Jesus was always mindful of individuals whether he found them in the synagogue, begging on the street, fetching water, tending sheep, fishing or collecting taxes. He looked past their duties. He spoke to the person behind the job. And because of His approach, lives changed for the good. People realized they mattered to God, that they weren’t invisible.
 
This reader’s comment has stirred me. It has reminded me that it really matters how I treat people, whether I meet them face to face, on-line or talk to them on the phone.
I’ve pledged to be kinder. If a busy man like Jesus always found time for people, can’t I do the same?
Jesus of Nazareth went about doing good and healing all that were oppressed . . . Acts. 10:38
Joan and Toivo Sepp lost two children to murder. They suffered many dark days, yet they took time to notice and talk to a lonely paper boy. Their noticing made a difference in his life. “After everything that happened to them,” my reader says, “they still had time for a chubby kid delivering the paper.”
 
Making it Personal: Lord, forgive me for not following your example of showing kindness to every human being who crosses my path. Make me alert and mindful to do better.
The articles on Joan Sepp: one, two, three
 
My book, One Good Word Makes all the Difference, is available here.

Wednesday, December 04, 2013

Why Shepherds? - Eleanor Shepherd

Why did God choose to announce the arrival of Christ to shepherds? Was there something significant or appropriate about this choice? 

The metaphor of shepherds occurs frequently in the Scriptures. I have often been told it is an appropriate name, for me as a pastor. 

Through the Old Testament prophets, God speaks out against religious leaders who are supposed to be shepherding the people of God and caring for them in a way that a shepherd cares for his sheep.  Jeremiah says, "Woe to the shepherds who are destroying and scattering the sheep of my pasture! declares The Lord." (Jeremiah 23:1-3).  The religious leaders were guilty of oppression, violence and personal aggrandizement.  They failed to follow God's ways themselves so they did not encourage the development of faith and justice in the people they served. 

            God does not allow their failure to deter Him from accomplishing His purposes or showing love for His people.  The prophet goes on to promise, "I will place shepherds over them who will tend them, and they will no longer be afraid or terrified, nor will any be missing," declares the Lord.  This was fulfilled partially following the Exile, with good leaders like Zerrubabbel, Ezra and Nehemiah.  The prophecy continues to tell how The Lord, ... will raise up for David a righteous Branch, a King who will reign wisely and do what is just and right in the land."         

            This righteous Branch promised by Jeremiah is Jesus.  He told His followers in John 10:11, "I am the good shepherd."  He best demonstrates for us what a true shepherd looks like.   
 

            A strange and appropriate irony of the Christmas story is that Jesus, the good shepherd who cares so deeply for God's people, was welcomed to this earth by shepherds.  
                
The contrast becomes more remarkable when we realize that at the time of Jesus, shepherds were in some ways the rejects of society with their lack of sophistication.  They were the lowest and most despised of the social groups in the city.  Nevertheless, instead of sending angels to the religious or political leaders, God sent the Message of "good news to all people" of the birth of Jesus to the shepherds. 

            Jesus is the Good Shepherd and it seems appropriate for Him to be welcomed to earth by those who understand what that means. Yet, there is more to the choice of shepherds.

The beloved Psalm 23 describes the good shepherd.  It affirms that The Lord provides for us, never abandons us and gives us the best life possible.  That is what it means to have Him as our shepherd.  I wonder if in choosing to share the glorious news with the shepherds, God's desire was that on earth, He might find those who will show such care and concern for His Son, even though He knew what lay ahead.  Is that why He gave the shepherds their role in the story of Christmas? 


 Another characteristic of shepherds helps us understand what was going on. 

            The Bible not only speaks of the shepherds, it also has something to say about sheep.  One of the titles given to Jesus by John the Baptist was the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world. 

The book of Revelation presents Jesus as the Lamb.  Revelation 5:6 quotes John, "Then I saw a Lamb, looking as if it had been slain, standing in the centre of the throne, encircled by the four living creatures and the elders." 
           
            The song sung by those encircling the throne is: "Worthy is the Lamb, who was slain, to receive power and wealth and wisdom and strength and honour and glory and praise."
           
Another irony of the Christmas story is that the shepherds to whom the news came were likely those who cared for the sheep chosen to be used in the Temple sacrifices.  These sheep were to be as perfect as possible and it was necessary for the shepherds to see that they were well cared for.  After the death and resurrection of Jesus the custom of offering sheep as a sacrifice for sin was no longer required.  Jesus, the perfect Lamb of God sacrificed His life for the sins of all mankind for all time on the Cross of Calvary.    


Why were the shepherds given such a significant role in the Christmas story?  Perhaps it was because if they were faithful to their calling they most closely resembled the way that God cares for people, and Christ the good shepherd was one of their own.  They too, more than anyone else understood the significance of His sacrifice, as the Lamb of God who came to take away the sin of the world. 
Word Guild Award
          2011

Word Guild Award
             2009


Monday, December 02, 2013

Exchanging Garden Bulbs for Advent/Christmas Bulbs/MANN

Change is good; it keeps me on my toes. I am reminded not to change 'just for the sake of change', but to find ways to bring newness and variety to my life. The season of Advent invites us to prepare: one week at a time as we move toward Christmas. Each week brings change with a new awareness of God's gifts of Christ to a broken world. Christmas is not always a happy time. Yet, in days of depression, grief or sorrow when some might wish this season over, there is goodness. And so we experience opposites, contradictions, and change as natural as plum pudding and tinsel.
A beautiful garden whether it's yours or mine pleases me in the summer and encourages me to go home and plant some seeds. Children's laughter as they slid down the barn hill brings back pleasant memories and makes me wish that I could do that just one more time. I bring in the garden bulbs already anticipating next year's colour and go to the basement to dig out the Christmas bulbs knowing that the first flood of light on the house roof will earn applause. I take great joy in seeing the still green grass show through the snow even in winter's infancy. As I approach the longest day of the year, I know that the very next day will have a few more moments of daylight.
What are some of the ways we can bring change, transformation and satisfaction into our life and the lives of others? Look at a ball of yarn in a store window and picture the sweater or mitts under the tree. Listen to an old man hum and make a plan to offer your gift of music to someone. Watch children at play and learn from them. Remember the loved one who is no longer present this Christmas and give a gift to a needy child in his or her memory. Look over your family tree and see those who are alone at Christmas and invite them to your table. Reflect on those conversations and exchanges with others that have grown a bitter root and find a way to reconcile. Stop and share a smile and handshake at the post office or stoplight. This is God at work through you.
Meet this Advent/Christmas season with energy, enthusiasm, anticipation, and hope in spite of any lingering shadows. Turn the everyday, ordinary and mundane events of each day into possibilities of a blessing. Look at your interaction with other people as seeds of hope and fresh beginnings in their lives. Give the greatest gift of love and offer it to other people in ways that will make a difference to them. Be assured that when you share material, spiritual or emotional gifts, goodness will be transformed to meet the needs of those around you. That's another miracle of the season.
Blessings,
Donna
http://www.donnamann.org
Aggie's Voice was launched October 29th at the former Burgoyne General Store.
A Rare Find will be launched Saturday, Dec.7th, Faith Family Books/Scarborough.                                    




Friday, November 29, 2013

Me, a Speaker?—Carolyn R. Wilker








Children speak naturally enough when they’re small. They find out that their words cause pleasure and joy, and even laughter. They, too, may be silent when a parent asks them to perform in front of family or friends.  
 I’ve decided that when the world becomes a stage, humans either jump into it or shy away from it, and I wonder whether Shakespeare was more comfortable writing his plays than performing them.
Standing in front of my peers and speaking was never easy. In school we were expected to present a speech or book report with virtually no guidance on presentation other than to practise at home.
 Even before that, I have a memory of a Christmas program at our one-room schoolhouse when I was in Grade One. We had practised our lines and songs for days and we knew them well and were excited when the day finally arrived. A large stage was set up at the front of the classroom, and parents, grandparents and others would fill the chairs in the audience that evening. Near the end of the program, when the entire student body was on stage singing, I ran to the edge of the stage, to my mother, after my nose began to bleed. Mom must have learned to sit near the front, because it happened more than once.
 By Grade 5 I was doing better, and my classroom speech was deemed worthy of entry into the county level competition. My mother held the copy of my speech that evening as she sat in the audience. I was allowed a prompt if I needed one. I looked out at the dark quiet audience, then straight over people’s heads at the clock at the back of the room as I had been instructed. At one point, I forgot the next words, froze, and only resumed when my mother prompted me. I finished the speech and walked off stage.
I didn’t go on to the next level. There may have been some measure of relief and perhaps some disappointment, for I knew my speech well, but it would be years later before I answered a question easily in class.
According to Wikipedia, glossophobia, or speech anxiety, is the fear of public speaking, or of speaking in general. Public speaking sits at the top of the list of fears, according to Mandel Communications, higher than financial problems and even higher than the fear of death, leading Jay Leno to joke, “I guess we’d rather be in the casket than delivering the eulogy.”
The Wikipedia article also notes that an “estimated 75% of all people experience some degree of anxiety when public speaking.” The article lists Toastmasters International and other speakers’ organizations under help and relief.
 I joined Toastmasters in 2004 and am glad that I did. The experience has been incredibly helpful in overcoming that fear. Many speakers I know who are Christian ask for prayer before going on stage; I suggest a combination of speaker training and prayer. The training can add an extra level of poise and professionalism, and the prayer will certainly help with courage and knowing that others are supporting you as you give your message. A speaking coach in our networking group had a line on his business card: Get the “um” out. The “ums” are just one of the possible distractions for an audience.
 Incidentally, one Toastmasters meeting was not enough; continuous practice in a safe environment has helped me gain confidence in myself and my message. Professional coaching has provided additional benefits.
 When my first book was published in 2011, I enjoyed the promotional events— the reading, speaking, and conversation at book signings. Do the nerves ever go away? Not necessarily. We just get better at channelling them.

Speaking to Rotary Club in November


                                         



Wednesday, November 27, 2013

What help has materialism been in understanding ourselves or the universe? - Denyse O'Leary


[Recently, I began a series on the ways in which questions in science are shaped in order to produce an atheist mindset … even when it isn’t even reasonable. I have linked the series to date below, but start with a short excerpt:]


What help has materialism been in understanding the universe's beginnings?

Many in cosmology have never made any secret of their dislike of the Big Bang, the generally accepted start to our universe first suggested by Belgian priest Georges Lemaître (1894-1966).
On the face of it, that is odd. The theory accounts well enough for the evidence. Nothing ever completely accounts for all the evidence, of course, because evidence is always changing a bit. But the Big Bang has enabled accurate prediction.

In which case, its hostile reception might surprise you. British astronomer Fred Hoyle (1915-2001) gave the theory its name in one of his papers -- as a joke. Another noted astronomer, Arthur Eddington (1882-1944), exclaimed in 1933, "I feel almost an indignation that anyone should believe in it -- except myself." Why? Because "The beginning seems to present insuperable difficulties unless we agree to look on it as frankly supernatural."
One team of astrophysicists (1973) opined that it "involves a certain metaphysical aspect which may be either appealing or revolting." Robert Jastrow (1925-2008), head of NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies, initially remarked, "On both scientific and philosophical grounds, the concept of an eternal Universe seems more acceptable than the concept of a transient Universe that springs into being suddenly, and then fades slowly into darkness." And Templeton Prize winner (2011) Martin Rees recalls his mentor Dennis Sciama's dogged commitment to an eternal universe, no-Big Bang model:

For him, as for its inventors, it had a deep philosophical appeal -- the universe existed, from everlasting to everlasting, in a uniquely self-consistent state. When conflicting evidence emerged, Sciama therefore sought a loophole (even an unlikely seeming one) rather as a defense lawyer clutches at any argument to rebut the prosecution case.
Evidence forced theorists to abandon their preferred eternal-universe model. From the mid 1940s, Hoyle attempted to disprove the theory he named. Until 1964, when his preferred theory, the Steady State, lost an evidence test.
In 1965, an unexpected discovery both confirmed and publicized the Big Bang: Two physicists at AT&T Bell Laboratories in New Jersey, Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson, accidentally discovered the cosmic microwave background (CMB), the radiation apparently left over from the origin. Then in 1990, NASA's Cosmic Background Explorer (COBE) satellite confirmed Big Bang cosmology with more accurate measurements. A 2011 discovery of gas generated minutes after the Big Bang further confirmed predictions.
That wasn't good news for those who track the progress of science by the progress of atheism. "These men and women have built their entire worldview on atheism," says cosmologist Frank Tipler: "When I was a student at MIT in the late 1960s, I audited a course in cosmology from the physics Nobelist Steven Weinberg. He told his class that of the theories of cosmology, he preferred the Steady State Theory because 'it least resembled the account in Genesis.'"
So disapproval snowballed along with evidence rather than with disconfirmation. In 1989, Nature's physics editor John Maddox predicted, "Apart from being philosophically unacceptable, the Big Bang is an over-simple view of how the Universe began, and it is unlikely to survive the decade ahead." In 1992, Geoffrey Burbidge of the University of California at San Diego taxed his colleagues with rushing off to join "the First Church of Christ of the Big Bang." Stephen Hawking opined in 1996, "Many people do not like the idea that time has a beginning, probably because it smacks of divine intervention. ... There were therefore a number of attempts to avoid the conclusion that there had been a big bang." ... 

What has materialism done for science?

Big Bang exterminator wanted, will train

Copernicus, you are not going to believe who is using your name. Or how.

 “Behold, countless Earths sail the galaxies ... that is, if you would only believe ...

 Don’t let Mars fool you. Those exoplanets teem with life!

 But surely we can’t conjure an entire advanced civilization?

 How do we grapple with the idea that ET might not be out there?

Popular Posts