The lawsuit contends that [creationism was] why Armitage’s employment at Cal State Northridge was terminated, with one professor allegedly storming into his office and shouting: “We are not going to tolerate your religion in this department!” More.
Friday, October 07, 2016
Armitage "creationist" settlement: Science vs. religion? - Denyse O'Leary
In the recently settled soft dino tissue find case, part of the fired prof’s evidence was the following incident:
It strikes me that Prof Stormer thinks that there is a hard and fast distinction to be made between “science” and “religion.” But the distinction falls apart when examined.
Here is a hypothetical example: My religion, we’ll say, teaches that killing animals is wrong and therefore eating meat is wrong.
It would be easy to come up with a wealth of science information on health, diet, and ecology issues around meat-eating. Not too surprisingly, I know much more of this evidence than most people do, and use it to argue my case in friendly conversation in the lunchroom.
There are many issues on which one can come up with competing bodies of reputable evidence and most people tend to know more about the evidence that supports their views (confirmation bias).
So I insist that my arguments are indeed science-based and that the reason my religion forbids meat-eating is that it corresponds to reality. Just because the teaching originally came in the form of a prophetic utterance does not demonstrate that it is untrue.
My employer, however, insists that my case is based on religion and fires me for arguing it peacefully in the lunch room.
Now here is where things get interesting: Even from a naturalist atheist perspective, my religion’s teaching, that meat-eating is wrong, can be accounted for as a way that humans survive and pass on their selfish genes. If the religion is millennia old, showing that its perspective is wrong will at least take some work.
In other words, it is much more difficult to separate "science" from "religion" than some suppose. It is impossible to say whether a person believes that the universe is designed or that meat-eating is a bad idea or that one should rest one day in seven only because of their religion if there is evidence to support the view. That would be "mind-reading."
The distinction between “science” and “religion” will thus usually be without merit. It is especially troubling in the Armitage case because, while there may not be much evidence to support young Earth creationism, what Armitage had was evidence, unless it can be proved otherwise.
One rather hopes he will come up with more soft tissue, mostly for the cell biology value but also to watch his former bosses squirm. They deserve it. O’Leary for News
See also: Creationist scholar receives big settlement It sounds like Armitage’s religion had come up with some evidence the U didn’t want to face, let alone rebut. Perhaps he can use the money wisely.
Armitage settlement: Nuclear chemist Jay Wiles’s thoughts Whatever one thinks of the evidence base for young Earth creationism, it speaks very poorly of Cal State Northridge that their response to one such piee of evidence was simply to fire the guy who found it. It makes one wonder whether they are suppressing other information - information that they have control of.
Follow UD News at Twitter!
Posted by Michael Laven at 10/07/2016 08:36:00 am
Yes or No could be so boring at times, can't it? To catch my drift on the topic, click on the video below: This clip is part of ...
I'm writing this blog minutes before the clock strikes midnight. When you read it I will be collecting the final few memorie...
There are many reasons to doubt the “conscious machines” myth, including Levin’s Law and the general difficulty of pinning down what “in...
During the recent holidays I took my nine- and seven-year-old granddaughters to see Mary Poppins Returns. In anticipation, them with ...
Today I reach into the 'grab-bag' from ‘ancient history,' abbreviated and adapted from one of my column articles from twenty yea...
I love a witty put-down. I know, I know, what kind of Christian am I to get my giggles at another’s misfortune. It's an inherited t...
A phrase I do not remember hearing frequently, has surpized me in the last three days, at least twice, in totally unrelated con...
Not! (Christian computer science prof Robert J. Marks has the real story at Mind Matters. I’m his editor and I supplied some of the infor...
Our pastor spoke this Sunday about John the Baptist preaching in the wilderness, a place where all the usual rules are thrown into con...
Paul and his companions tried to preach in Asia but the Holy Spirit closed that door. They tried in Bithynia. Again, the Spirit shu...